Search for: "TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 11:22 am
A trial court in the District of Columbia, 2008 U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Earl Butz, Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, et al., http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/511/331/399042/>, United State Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Taylor, et al., 371 Md. 617, 810 A.2d 964 (2002). [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Taylor, et al., 371 Md. 617, 810 A.2d 964 (2002). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
No. 08 Civ. 7810 (LTS)(JCF).United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Fifty years ago today, Chief Justice Warren delivered the unanimous decision of the court; within that decision was this statement: In June 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Jordan, et al. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:22 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia on October 11, 2011 (Gaffney v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
GARZA ENERGY TRUST ET AL.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-02-00136-CV, 166 SW3d 301, 05-05-05)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment, renders judgment in part, and remands the case to the trial court. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
In State of Maryland v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
., et al., v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” Dowling v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" Dowling v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
By Atreya Mathur In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
